My Reason for Becoming a Nurse Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

My Reason for Becoming a Nurse - Essay Example Caring for patients in their own environments is both rewarding and challenging. The many dynamics present in a home environment often require an interdisciplinary approach to issues and concerns. As I review my career, I realize my focus has been on teaching others - another reason I love nursing is that it allows me to do this. I get a great deal of personal satisfaction from helping patients, and from helping families care for their loved ones. This involves teaching them about disease processes, medication, and signs and symptoms of complications from terminal illness. Most important of all to me is to give my patients the best quality of life possible, and to show their families how they can help their loved ones. I am presently working as an Admission Nurse in a hospice. This work is unlike any I have previously experienced. Having now worked in the hospice for 18 months I have realized that you truly must have a calling to help others during such a crucial period in their lives. Many people are so overwhelmed that it is necessary to approach the patient from a holistic approach. I truly endorse the hospice philosophy because I feel that an interdisciplinary approach to health care is very important. This role is very challenging, and flexibility is essential in providing good care.

Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Research Proposal Example Knowing any potential impact would further lead to the investigation on how creditors would create any important accounting-related adjustments just to be able to ensure survival of their business. Thus, the following questions will be answered at the end of the study. This study will employ both quantitative and qualitative method of research through a survey questionnaire and personal interview. In the end, this study will lead to understanding the micro-level impact of DRO on lending and banking institution, and increasing the knowledge on the specific probable moves of banks and lenders to maximise their revenue on short-term loans amidst the implementation of DRO. The purpose of this research is to investigate whether the perceptions on Debt Relief Order (DRO) have significant impacts on the revenue of creditors especially those who have potential profit in offering short-term loans with high interest rates. Knowing any potential impact would further lead to the investigation on how creditors would create any important accounting-related adjustments just to be able to ensure survival of their business. One of the ways in order to protect an individual or a company from exact financial obligation from creditors is to file bankruptcy (Elias, 2011). This is a way of doing something to secure any form of financial obligations that could no longer be handled accordingly. However, in any way this is also a remarkable opportunity to actually create a fresh start when it comes to financial concern of an individual or organization. On the other hand, this also has a remarkable impact on the part of the creditors. Although, individuals who are in financial trouble may actually find it hard to secure financial support in the future for not being able to pay any accounts payable, insolvency on their part could create at some

David Hare & Skylight Essay Example for Free

David Hare Skylight Essay Skylight by David Hare is a post 1914, post Thatcher drama, dealing with matters of life, love and circumstance. It is set in a small, well lived in, flat, Northwest London, where Kyra, a middle aged, self-reliant teacher, lives. Tom, a guilt ridden, controlling, entrepreneur, randomly appears, at Kyras doorstep. He casually invades her privacy, wanting to rekindle past love, when success was his, after a three-year separation. The stubborn pair hold the stage for the entire 2 1/2 hours tearing away at each others deceptions and hypocrisies, except for brief but significant, visits by Toms rebellious, insecure, son Edward. This play is very contemporary, dealing with issues relevant at the time. The time is post Thatcher, although Tom still is part of the Conservative, right wing system, working for himself. Kyra, on the contrary, is a left wing, labour supporter, who helps other people. Tom is not able to put passion before political values, whereas Kyra is. David Hare structures the play quite effectively, using 2 acts and 4 scenes. The play is detailed, and probes the depths of intimacy between the 4 characters-one of whom is Alice, who we never see, but whose presence is always lurking in the form of guilt. The emotional scar has been made before the play even starts. The memory of Alice remains a sad spectre for Tom and Kyra. Edward comes right at the beginning, which is an introduction to Tom because it brings back all the memories of him. I think that when Tom reappears, Kyra may have doubted leaving him because she loves him, but she also hates part of him as well and from pg. 56 she realises that they have such different lifestyles, and are utterly incompatible. Tom: I was thinking, I could get used to this. Maybe this area isnt so bad. Over there, I was thinking, Im going to put my telly Kyra: Have you still got that big one? Tom: Oh no. Its much bigger now Its going to take up most of that wall Tom just decides that he is going to move in, without Kyras consent. Kyra doesnt actually say no though, but that is because she knows, from then on that it is all just a fantasy, she is the one in control because she realises how desperate he is for her. Neither of them can cope with Toms depression, which comes and goes with monotonous regularity, so if they stayed together, Kyra would be crushed by Tom and it would all end in disaster.

Fashion in the Twenty First Century | History of Fashion

Fashion in the Twenty First Century | History of Fashion Fashion has launched full throttle, changing outrageously through different eras of time. Have you ever thought about how much fashion has changed over the course of time? Have you wondered why it has changed so dramatically? Or how fast it could change? Although the way we dress now is completely different, it all revolves around making fashion statements. Fashion in the twenty first century is made from all the changes in the nineteenth and twentieth centurys and has impacted the lives of many people in different ways. During the nineteenth century, the clothes that men and woman wore were not always what would have been preferred to be worn. Depending on the time of the day would depend on which outfit a lady would wear. For a casual morning look, worn only at home would be a dress made with a short neckline, long slick pattern and would cover the majority of any skin exposed. For an evening look, a long short sleeved dress with an open neckline and white gloves would be what was usually seen. Woman would have tailors hand design replicas of professionally designed clothing at an affordable price to fit the latest styles (19th; Fashion through the Ages from Overcoats to Petticoats 13). During the mid 1800s, all outfits worn by woman were consisted of different materials to complete a whole wardrobe. The ensemble that woman wore, composed of pantalettes, chemise, corset and a petticoat. Pantalettes were an article of clothing wore under everything else. Pantalettes were leg length under garments made from linen or silk, designed with tucks and flounces to give a layered look toward the feet. A chemise, pronounced as shimmy, was the main one piece under garment worn over the pantalettes. A corset would be worn over the chemise; it is an article of clothing worn on the upper half of a woman, used to add lift to the bust area and to add shape to the waist and hips. The higher the waistline the better, a high waistline would draw attention away from the natural shape of the waistline. Due to how tightly a corset would be worn, caused health problems for some woman. The corset is pulled together so tightly that it would squeeze the inner organs of a womans body together causing digestive problems and may cause issues with giving birth to a child; also it could even result in death. According to the weather outside and the season would determine whether or not a petticoat would be necessary to wear. Gloves and bonnets were always worn. Long beautiful hair with possible curls through it was often seen during the early 1800s (Fashion through the Ages from Overcoats to Petticoats 14; 1900s; 19th;Fashion through). Through the 1850s to the1890s, new inventions had progressed. Synthetic dyes were invented to create a new variety of colors along with hoops that had come into effect, giving the new style of dress wear a way to be different. Hoops were a new style for woman to try and had become very popular. The thin steel wired dress made it fun for woman to look up to part. Having a new style approaching, the bodies of woman became odd. Due to the harsh bodily trauma caused by the corset most women developed an S shape body structure. The stomach would be pressed back and the breast would be pushed forward. Soon after the strange body change in a woman the corset was banned and officially out of style. Woman became more involved with activities around this time as well. Not being able to do much in a dress, more comfortable clothes were designed for woman; this included blouses and wide trousers. Also worn around this time were womens suits, which were a tailored jacket, a skirt and a blouse you could tuck into the skirt (Fashion Change; Fashion through the Ages from Overcoats to Petticoats 15). From the nineteenth century to the twentieth century fashion changed drastically, going from hoops, which was a large ensemble to more slender apparel. During the early twentieth century, corsets had come back in to action with a softer feel on a woman, making the S shape more relaxing. In the 1920s, women were known as a flapper, overcoming a boyish look, due to the short haircuts; such as the bob, short skirts, and straight dresses. Woman insisted on working and being more involved with sports during this time. Designers started to try out new hemlines, making them long in the back but shorter in the front. Waistlines were exceptionally low at this time, while hemlines were just below the knee (Fashion through the Ages from Overcoats to Petticoats 16-19;Pidduck). Starting a new look during the 1930s to the 1960s was complicated. Due to WWII; shortage of fabric and materials made outfit choices simpler for woman to choose what to wear. A square shouldered jacket, pencil skirt, with an endearing blouse was an outfit seen everyday around this time. Fashion had took a turn by the 1960s, teenagers wanted to have a different style than their parents did. Designers Mary Quant and Barbara Hulanicki made geometric shaped clothes for young teens, which made it fun and interesting to get dressed every day. Miniskirts had expanded across the world for being known as Americas high fashion. Miniskirts were long skirts cut just above the knees or possibly cut shorter. Dresses were cut to be slimming against the body and bell bottoms were a big hit in the 60s. Men and woman both wore bell bottoms with plat form shoes, due to having that outrageous disco fever. According to Perry Clement, During the 1960s woman would burn their bras and go bra less to fight f or equal rights against men, this was also known as the free love era. During the 1980s, sweaters and leather dresses were worn very tightly to show off body features, also seen on women around this time were halter tops with a shirt that could be tied in a knot to show off stomach features with bell bottom jeans. Throughout the rest of the 1900s, fashion had taken a spin. All the colors became loud and ravishing along with the change of fabrics and new cuts. The pattern schemes were extreme changing from classy to sassy. Hair styles became more advanced changing from long curly hair, to having layered hair, shorter hair or possibly even having up-dos done took affect during the 1900s (Clement; Fashion through the Ages from Overcoats to Petticoats 20-23; Pidduck; Fashion through). Wear what is right for you, and put your own stamp on it. The way people dress these days can be influenced by how people dressed during the nineteenth and twentieth centurys. Every outfit has different materials and accessories combined together to make on look, such as jeans, a stunning blouse, tennis shoes or flats, and accessories. Older fashion has made a fashion statement impacting the lives of everyone now. The way people dress now would not be the way it is if it was not for the nineteenth and twentieth century. The way clothes are cut, the different techniques on colors used, and how people physically wear clothes are all related to how people wore clothes then, due to the success made from fashion over the years (Roppatte 76; ). During this time of the twenty first century, fashion has taken a few steps back. Designers are not only focusing on the next big thing but are also focusing on how to bring the past into the future. Miniskirts are still a major style worn now by teenagers with the added accessory of leggings; which are skin tight multicolored tights, worn underneath the skirt along with a daring blouse. Many women now, wear blue jeans and t-shirts for a more comfortable ensemble. For a night out on the town, V neck blouses with low rise jeans could possibly be worn or for a more elegant look, a long shear gown with matching gloves and high heels could also be seen. New millennium fashion is composed of the 60s, 70s and the 80s mixed together to make the 2000s a major fashion statement. If it was not for fashion designers dedication to making clothes throughout the past years, then many people would not be as involved with fashion as they are today (Roppatte 78). Fashion is a small word, with many different characteristics. Unlike the nineteenth century, we now wear whatever we want whenever we want. The twentieth century changed the output on women by giving them the right to fight for what they wanted to wear. Looking back on fashion in the nineteenth and twentieth centurys has impacted the lives of people every day. Fashion now from then has changed but yet it is still the same in many ways. Do not under estimate what goes out of style, what goes out will always come back.

Religion and Politics Essay examples -- Papers Church State Separation

Religion and Politics Both liberals and conservatives have become quite adept at mixing religion and politics in our current society. One also continues to observe an ongoing practice of civil religion demonstrated by presidents and office-seekers on both the left and right. Generally, the leftist merger of religion and politics has received greater social acceptability because it has been cloaked in such rights' causes as civil rights, women's rights, or economic rights (the social distribution of wealth). The advocating of these rights issues have provided an appearance of transcending religion, keeping the left relatively free from criticism of any church and state overlap. Christian Conservatives, however, have found it more difficult to reasonably combine faith and politics because they have more overtly recognized that their political positions are grounded on faith assumptions. This has resulted in numerous attacks by both non-Christians and Christians alike against the conservative attempt to merge religion and politics. Three arguments have been used most frequently against the conservative mixture of religion and politics. In what follows each of these arguments is stated and then refuted. The first argument is that politics is too worldly. The essence of the argument is that politics is part of this world's system, and Christ clearly taught His followers to "love not the world," and to flee from worldly activities. There is a danger of becoming caught up in th... ...hermore, in the Bible there is much political activity by God's servants. The judges and kings ruled under God. The prophets and Moses were quite political. Daniel served in the civil governments of Babylon and Persia. Joseph governed in Egypt. The Apostles spoke of following God's rules rather than men's. In conclusion, to be obedient to Christ requires political activity. Jesus is quite clear about the need to overcome social injustices. If Christ tells us to confront the forces of evil, but society tells us not to, and even makes a law against bringing religion into politics, then who should we follow, the state or Christ? In the broadest sense, we are called to political activity because we are responsible to apply Christian principles and standards to all areas of our society, and politics is one of these areas.

John Rawls And Utilitarianism :: Rawls Utilitarinism Philosophy Essays

  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The social contract theory of John Rawls challenges utilitarianism by pointing out the impracticality of the theory. Mainly, in a society of utilitarians, a citizens rights could be completely ignored if injustice to this one citizen would benefit the rest of society. Rawls believes that a social contract theory, similar those proposed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, would be a more logical solution to the question of fairness in any government. Social contract theory in general and including the views of Rawls, is such that in a situation where a society is established of people who are self interested, rational, and equal, the rules of justice are established by what is mutually acceptable and agreed upon by all the people therein. This scenario of negotiating the laws of that society that will be commonly agreed upon and beneficial to all is what Rawls terms "The Original Position and Justification". Rawls states that for this system to work, all citizens must see themselves as being behind a "veil of ignorance". By this he means that all deciding parties in establishing the guidelines of justice (all citizens) must see themselves as equal to everyone paying no mind to there economic situation or anything else that they could keep in mind to negotiate a better situation to those qualities. For example, if everyone in this society has an equal amount of influence toward the establishing of specific laws, a rich man may propose that taxes should be equal for all rather than proportionate to ones assets. It is for this and similar situations that Rawls feels that everyone must become oblivious to themselves. Rawls believes that the foundational guideline agreed upon by the those in the original position will be composed of two parts. The first of these rules of justice being one that enforces equal rights and duties for all citizens and the later of the two one which regulates the powers and wealth of all citizens.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the conception of utilitarianism possessed by Rawls, an impartial spectator and ideal legislator are necessary components. The impartial spectator is one who rational and sensitive to all of the desires of society. The impartial spectator must feel these desires as if they were his own desires and by doing such, give each of them priority over other desires and organize them into one system from which the ideal legislator tries to maximize satisfaction for all citizens by manipulating and adjusting the policy for that society. By this theory of utilitarianism, Rawls argues that the decision making process is being integrated into one conscience and that this system

No man has a natural right to commit aggression

The United States Constitution is a document considered almost sacred by many Who live in this country.   Liberty and freedom are often considered our greatest resources (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p10).   However, while the idea of â€Å"liberty and justice for all† stands optimistically in its citizen’s minds, the reality is much more complicated.   Questions arise such as; does freedom of speech include yelling fire in a crowded theater?   When one person’s rights infringe upon another, whose liberties take precedence?   In some cases, the question has even arisen, does â€Å"all men are created equal† really apply to all men?   What about women? In creating the United States, a fine balance has been created between the majority and the minority.   Obviously, for a functioning democracy to work, the majority vote would rule.   As Abraham Lincoln said â€Å"Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible (Rejai p70).†Ã‚   However, he also commented that the majority must be constrained â€Å"With deliberate changes of popular opinion and sentiments (Rejai p70)† in order to remain a free people. Still it was important to the founders of the United States for the importance of the individual to be retained.   The Bill of Rights, especially the first amendment, was written to remove government’s ability to limit those rights (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p11).   The authors understood that freedom of speech, the press and religion were major rights and needed extra protection from repression. Over time the government was also used to prevent individuals from impeding on the rights of other persons.   For instance, Amendment 26 in the Bill of Rights states â€Å"The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States of by any other State on account of age.†Ã‚   Upon reaching adulthood, it was determined that everyone should have their equal vote (Burns, Peltason & Cronin p 14) and no one should be able to deny an individual that right. Minority rights continue to be an issue, however, despite the passing of several amendments to protect such rights.   In some cases, this is done because it has been determined that the protection of society is more important than the rights of the individual.   The fourteenth amendment, for instance, states â€Å"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.†Ã‚   However, in many cases, laws are passed that interfere with the right of sexual predators by forcing them to declare themselves to law enforcement and/or their neighbors. In other cases, despite the goal of â€Å"liberty and justice for all† minorities continue to be discriminated against for religious or political reasons, or simply because they are minorities.   Homosexuals, for instance, continue to be denied the right to marry in the majority of states (Nava & Dawidoff pxii).   In this case, the vote of the majority continues to outweigh the minority despite the loss of civil liberties and despite that fact that this has no direct effect on the majority. On the other hand, in certain cases when the rights of the minority and the majority clash, the minority-member is given precedence, due to past injustices done to the minority as a whole.   This is the case in affirmative action, where minorities are given preference over the majority due to their past lack of status.   The practice seeks to make up for previous lack of economic and educational opportunities, often at the expense of those classes who have had them. The balance between the society and the individual, majorities and minorities is a difficult one.   In forming the Constitution, attempts were made to appease all sides and amendments were made as society’s ideas of what were important changed.   This pendulum continues to be in constant flux, with the majority or minorities occasionally taking precedence over the other as elected officials see a need.   It remains a vital process however, since the entire foundation of the United States is dependant on this equilibrium. How can we maintain the proper balance between liberty and order, between diversity and uniformity, between individual rights and collective needs?†¦The problem, then, is how to balance individual rights against collective needs, remembering always that individual freedom   and social order are necessary to each other.   ( Burns, Peltason, & Cronin p124) Bibliography Burns, J.M., Peltason, J.W., & Cronin, T.E.. (1975). Government by the People, 9th Edition.   Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:   Prentice-Hall, Inc. Nava Michael & Dawidoff, Robert.   (1994). Created Euqal:   Why Gay Rights Matter to America.   New York:   St. Martin’s Press. Rejai, M..   (1976).   Democracy: The Contemporary Theories.   New York: Atherton Press. Shein, Lori (ed).   (1998). Inequality:   Opposing Viewpoints to Social Problems.   Dan Diego, CA: Greenhaven Pres, Inc.